Conference Program
| |
Friday, April
15, 2005 |
Graduate Student Pre-Conference |
| Opening Comments: 12–12:15pm |
Session
1: Harris 108, 12:15–1:45pm
U.S. Orientalism and Asian American Responses |
The first graduate panel showcases new Asian Americanist critiques of U.S. Orientalism.
Thomas Kim outlines the idea of the Orient and its mass cultural appeal in America
during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, illustrating how the
concept helped contain contradictions such as sequestering Asian immigrants
in an age of human justice. Sarah Park surveys twenty-eight picture
books that Korean or Korean American children take as their subject, explaining
why the image of the perpetual foreigner remains salient in them. Wen Jin uses
Yan Geling’s Fusang (The Lost Daughter
of Happiness),
a novel about a love triangle among a Chinatown prostitute, a Caucasian boy,
and a Chinese gangster, to show the transformation of the novel’s main
character into an embodiment of a new sexual politics and ethics that is not
based on discriminatory identification.
|
| |
Shuji Otsuka, History, Northwestern University (moderating) |
| |
Thomas W. Kim, English, The University
of Chicago
“The Oriental and the Modern in America” |
| |
Sarah Park, Library and Information
Science, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
“School Stories: Korean
American Children in Picture
Books” |
| |
Wen Jin, English, Northwestern
University
“Excessive Femininity as Critical Mimicry:
the Case of Yan Geling” |
|
Session
2: Harris 108, 2–3:30pm
Conjoined Fates: Asian Americans
and African Americans in the Postwar
American City |
The second panel explores the relations
between African Americans and Asian Americans
in postwar urban America in terms of both lived
social experience and cultural contructions about
their respective racial position within society.
Ellen Wu traces the historical construction of “model” Chinese
American families to show how social scientists, the mainstream media,
and government officials made explicit comparisons between Chinese
American and African American households. By deeming the one to be exemplary
to the other's pathology, Chinese in the United States came to be racially
marked, yet definitively not-black. Shanshan Lan uses ethnographic fieldwork
in Chicago’s
Chinatown and Bridgeport communities to critique reified notions of racism
based on a strictly black/white binary. She shows how working-class Chinese
Americans sharing common inner-city spaces with African Americans have
different understandings of racial difference than middle-class Chinese
Americans living in the suburbs. Meredith Oda examines the post-war development
of San Francisco’s Japantown. The city’s position
within a reconstructed nexus of U.S.-Japan foreign relations facilitated
the selective distillation of an existing residential mix of
low-income whites, African Americans, and Japanese Americans. Celebratory
references to its Japanese American residents created a desireable ethnically-identified
community,
“Japantown,” while contributing to ouster of African American residents
into undesirable housing conditions.
|
| |
Stephen Mak, History, Northwestern University (moderating) |
| |
Ellen D. Wu, History, The University
of Chicago
“’Chinatown Offers Us A Lesson’:
Chinese Americans, Juvenile Delinquency, Family,
and Race in Postwar America” |
| |
Shanshan Lan, Anthropology, University
of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
“Interpreting Chinese-Black
Relations in Multi-racial Chicago” |
| |
Meredith Oda, History, The
University of Chicago
“Building Japantown: Redevelopment,
Japanese Americans, and African
Americans in Postwar San Francisco |
|
| |
|
Asian American Studies
at Northwestern:
Activism, Ethnic Studies, Diaspora, and Beyond |
| Opening Remarks: Harris 107, 4-4:30pm |
Session
I: Harris 107, 4:30–6pm
The Northwestern Hunger Strike: Ten Years Later |
Ten years after the 1995 hunger strike, the Program has invited
students, administrators, faculty and others involved to
reunite for a commemorative panel. Panel participants and
the audience are invited to discuss their respective roles
in the situation then, to reflect on the place of Asian American
Studies at Northwestern in the years since the strike — and
in their subsequent careers and lives — and to offer
thoughts on the direction and shape Asian American Studies
at Northwestern should take in the next ten years and beyond. |
| |
Richard Morimoto, Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Cell
Biology, Northwestern University (moderating) |
| |
Lawrence Dumas, Provost, Northwestern
University |
| |
Robert Yap, Northwestern alumnus,
attorney-at-law |
| |
Freda Lin, Northwestern alumna, teacher |
| |
Woodrow Lucas, Northwestern alumnus,
M.Div. and MBA candidate, Vanderbilt University |
| |
Paul Igasaki, Northwestern alumnus,
former member, Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences
Board of Visitors |
|
Opening reception: Harris 108, 6-7:15pm
Student Commemoration: “Relive History, Revive Legacy” |
Keynote : Harris 107, 7:15pm
Amiri Baraka |
| |
|
| |
Saturday, April 16, 2005 |
Session
II: Harris 107, 9:30–11am
Cross-Racial Coalitions Inside and Outside the
Academy |
Although the lives and experiences
of Asian Americans have intersected with and connected
to the lives of other racial minorities, too often their
experiences have been considered separately. This session
highlights moments of cross-racial coalition — and disagreement — between
Asian Americans and other racial minorities, particularly
African Americans, and discusses the significance of
such coalitions for African American Studies, Asian American
Studies, and Ethnic Studies. |
| |
Darlene Clark Hine, African-American Studies, Northwestern
University (chair) |
| |
Scott Kurashige, History, University
of Michigan |
| |
Charlie Chin, independent artist/writer,
member of A Grain of Sand |
| |
Jacalyn Harden, Anthropology, Wayne State
University |
| |
Joy Ann Williamson, Education, Stanford
University |
| |
Dwight McBride, African-American Studies,
Northwestern University (moderating) |
|
Session
III: Harris 107, 11:30–1:00pm
Students’ Roles in Asian American Studies
Programs: A Conversation |
Students have played crucial and essential roles in creating
Ethnic Studies and Asian American Studies Programs in the
late 1960s on the West Coast and in the 1990s in the East
Coast and the Midwest. Yet turnover, graduation, and the
absence of organized means for both current students and
alumni to remain involved have resulted in little sustained
student involvement in the subsequent running and development
of programs. What roles should students (and former students)
have within Asian American Studies programs? What specific
forms might this involvement take? Is there a place for student
activism within an academic program and within the university
environment generally? Former student participants in the
1995 student push for Asian American Studies at Northwestern
discuss these issues with students active in the Northwestern
community today, reflecting upon and comparing their respective
experiences. |
| |
John Park, English, University of Illinois, Chicago (moderating) |
| |
Prajwal Ciryam, junior, Academic Vice
President, Associated Student Government, Northwestern
University |
| |
David Hish, Northwestern alumnus |
| |
Gene Kim, Northwestern alumnus, attorney-at-law |
| |
Yaejoon Kwon, junior Asian American Studies
minor, Northwestern University |
| |
Grace Lou, Northwestern alumna, attorney-at-law |
| |
Rosa Nguyen, junior Asian American Studies
minor, Northwestern University |
| |
Eric Salcedo, Northwestern alumnus, Assistant
to the Attorney General on Asian American Affairs, Illinois |
| |
Susan Wu, Northwestern alumna, pediatrician,
Childen’s Hospital, Oakland, CA |
| |
Sarah Yun, senior, Northwestern University |
|
| lunch (on your own) |
Session
IV: Harris 107, 2–3:30pm
New Directions in Ethnic Studies:
Interrogating Diasporas |
Ethnic studies has become increasingly
interdisciplinary and diverse as scholars have turned
to different theoretical and analytic frameworks to address
the changing nature of their subjects and the questions
they asked of them. Many ethnic studies scholars have
adopted the notion of “diaspora” as
a way to move beyond the borders of the United States and
the confines of assimilationist or race relations paradigms
and to consider their subjects from an explicitly transnational
perspective. This turn toward diaspora has provoked intense
and often heated debate. At the intersection of diaspora
studies with African American, Asian American, and Latino
American Studies are profound tensions between a focus on
analysis of race and racial structures and a focus on trans/international
connections. This session lays these tensions out for examination,
explores the benefits and disadvantages of both approaches,
and considers the possibility of constructing a new approach
that combines both ethnic and diaspora studies perspectives. |
| |
Harvey Neptune, History, Northwestern University (chair) |
| |
Evelyn Hu-DeHart, Center for the Study
of Race and Ethnicity in America, Brown University |
| |
Sandhya Shukla, Anthropology and Asian
American Studies Columbia University |
| |
Ramón Gutíerrez, History
and Ethnic Studies, University of California, San Diego |
| |
Michael Hanchard, Institute for Diaspora
Studies and Political Science, Northwestern University |
|
Poetry
Reading: Experimental Writers, Harris 108, 3:45–5:15pm |
A reading by four “experimental” Asian
American writers, whose work, each in its own way,
challenges us to think and re-think our assumptions,
notions and expectations of the category “Asian
American literature.” Their innovative writing
breaks new ground both formally and conceptually and
is certainly among the most exciting work being produced
by contemporary American writers. |
| |
Mei-mei Berssenbrugge
|
| |
Tan Lin
|
| |
Brian Kim Stefans
|
| |
Max Yeh |
|
Keynote: Harris 107, 8pm
Helen Zia |
| |
|
| |
Sunday, April 17, 2005 |
Session
V: Harris 107, 9:30–11am
Asian American Studies: A Critical Enterprise
in the Academy |
What is the difference between “Asian American Studies” as
a field of critical intellectual inquiry and any academic studies
that take “Asian Americans” as their subject? Proponents
of Asian American Studies have faced this question since the
inception of the field in the 1960s, and the question remains
crucial to the establishment of Asian American Studies as a
legitimate field of inquiry. This session addresses dual aspects
of Asian American Studies as a critical enterprise in the academy:
1) tracing the intellectual directions of the field and its
connections to other fields, and 2) discussing strategies for
establishing AAS within the academy, that is, for implementing
the vision embodied in the intellectual enterprise of Asian
American Studies. |
| |
Gary Okihiro, Director, Center for the Study of Ethnicity and
Race, Columbia University (moderating/comment) |
| |
Catherine Ceniza Choy, Ethnic Studies,
University of California, Berkeley; Edith Kreeger-Wolf
Visiting Scholar, Northwestern University |
| |
David Eng, English, Rutgers University |
| |
Dorothy Wang, English and Asian American
Studies, Northwestern University |
| |
Ji-Yeon Yuh, History and Asian American
Studies, Northwestern University |
| |
Karianne Yokota, History and American
Studies, Yale University |
|
Keynote: Harris 107, 11:30am–1pm
Ishmael Reed, “American Poetry: From Totems to Hip Hop” |
| Closing Remarks: Harris 107, 1–1:15pm |
|
|
|